![]() |
[Contact Us] |
Noise to Knowledge |
||
|
by R.M. Schneider Knowledge Management is not new. Knowledge management goes back as far as human memory, and then evolved into stone tables, books, and file cabinets. Then--suddenly--in the late 20th Century "sticky notes" arrived. One of the great myths of Knowledge Management that is a technology solution. It's not. Knowledge Management is a process that can be used to share and transfer knowledge between traditional "silos" of service management. It is a management process that transforms "noisy" thoughts and ideas into learnings and then into knowledge. There are four key questions that are key to developing a knowledge management process for any organization:
Noise to KnowledgeI have developed a simplistic model which I call "Noise to Knowledge". It describes what I have observed to be natural processes for how information moves between three identifiable nodes: (1) Noise, (2) Learning, and (3) Knowledge. Information inside each node is "stored" in particular types of "buckets". The most effective
organizations have natural processes which move the information through filters and tools to drive information from "noise" to "knowledge". The nodes can be described with examples:
Information flows between notes due to Processes, deliberate or "natural", that push and pull the information through "filters". It is presumed and assumed that there is some sort of appropriate (or inappropriate as the case may be) decision and/or thinking process that moves the information between the nodes. The above model does not attempt to describe these often "un-describable" processes. It is essential that people have the right "tools" to manage the process of
moving information amongst the nodes. In BC (before computers) time, the
world had this pretty much figured out. However, now that we have
computers this is getting all too complicated because we do not in general have
the right tools ubiquitously available. Even small teams of people who
work the same organization or projects do not use the right tools--for example,
private email folders is not an appropriate place to store "knowledge"; but in
absence of anywhere else that is where it will go. This appears to be not unusual for many "computing information/knowledge" communities (maybe because the information has a short "half-life" value). I've observed other "communities" where the nodes and processes I mention are more complete and hence more knowledge is retained and propagated. Rob Schneider is Managing Director of RMSchneider Limited, a management consultancy in Edinburgh (Scotland) specialising in Projects (Management, Collaboration, and Systems).
|